DRAM Antitrust Plaintiffs File 3rd Amended Complaint

Law360, New York (February 28, 2008, 12:00 AM EST) -- Following a major setback last month in a proposed class action over alleged price-fixing in the dynamic random access memory market, the plaintiffs' attorneys have filed a slightly amended complaint, as they await a chance to appeal a judge's ruling.

In January, U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton of the Northern District of California dismissed a majority of indirect purchaser antitrust claims made by customers who purchased computers containing DRAM technology, ruling that they lacked antitrust standing. That ruling would knock out about 90% of the...
To view the full article, register now.

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.