Sandifer Oral Arguments Reveal New Middle Ground

Law360, New York (November 5, 2013, 5:22 PM EST) -- On Monday, Nov. 4, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. on the issue of the meaning of the term “clothes” in section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Under the FLSA, generally, employees must be paid for donning and doffing protective clothing if they are required by law or the employer to change into such clothing at the work site. However, section 3(o) of the FLSA, passed by Congress in 1949, provides that in a unionized setting...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.