Sandifer Oral Arguments Reveal New Middle Ground

Law360, New York (November 5, 2013, 5:22 PM EST) -- On Monday, Nov. 4, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. on the issue of the meaning of the term “clothes” in section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Under the FLSA, generally, employees must be paid for donning and doffing protective clothing if they are required by law or the employer to change into such clothing at the work site. However, section 3(o) of the FLSA, passed by Congress in 1949, provides that in a unionized setting...
To view the full article, register now.