Neutrogena Sunblock Label Suit Not Preempted, Judge Says

Law360, New York (January 8, 2014, 7:35 PM EST) -- A California judge on Wednesday rejected Neutrogena Corp.’s preemption argument in a class action over allegedly misleading “naturally sourced” labeling on sunscreen, ruling that false advertising claims under the laws of three states do not clash with federal regulations.

U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson said that Neutrogena would not be subject to conflicting state and federal cosmetic labeling requirements if it were found liable for misleading consumers about the synthetic ingredients in its Pure & Free line of sunscreen products.

Quoting from the U.S. Supreme...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Julie Fagan et al v. Neutrogena Corporation


Case Number

5:13-cv-01316

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

Stephen V. Wilson

Date Filed

July 29, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.