Neutrogena Sunblock Label Suit Not Preempted, Judge Says

Law360, New York (January 8, 2014, 7:35 PM EST) -- A California judge on Wednesday rejected Neutrogena Corp.’s preemption argument in a class action over allegedly misleading “naturally sourced” labeling on sunscreen, ruling that false advertising claims under the laws of three states do not clash with federal regulations.

U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson said that Neutrogena would not be subject to conflicting state and federal cosmetic labeling requirements if it were found liable for misleading consumers about the synthetic ingredients in its Pure & Free line of sunscreen products.

Quoting from the U.S. Supreme...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Julie Fagan et al v. Neutrogena Corporation


Case Number

5:13-cv-01316

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

Stephen V. Wilson

Date Filed

July 29, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.