Nationwide Needn't Defend Spam Faxer, 3rd Circ. Rules

Law360, Los Angeles (January 9, 2014, 7:05 PM EST) -- The Third Circuit affirmed Thursday a lower court's ruling that Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. doesn't need to defend a Pennsylvania commercial roofing company in class action litigation alleging it sent unsolicited faxes, saying the faxes were sent intentionally and could not be considered accidental.

In an unpublished opinion, the three-judge panel found that roofer David/Randall Associates Inc. wasn't entitled to coverage under a commercial general liability policy for injury or damage based on an "accident."

Randall Associates had argued that because the faxes had been sent by a third-party contractor they could be defined as accidental, but the panel ruled that...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!