Mott's Gets 'No Sugar Added' Labeling Claims Cut Down

Law360, Chicago (January 30, 2014, 7:59 PM EST) -- A California federal judge on Wednesday trimmed from a proposed class action claims alleging Mott’s LLP’s applesauce products are improperly labeled as having “no sugar added,” but let stand similar claims concerning the company’s apple juice.

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston agreed with Mott’s that plaintiff Mohammed Rahman had failed to back up his allegations that the applesauce products didn’t comply with U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations for “no sugar added” labeling. Rahman had alleged in his June 2013 complaint that because the applesauce products...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Rahman v. Mott's LLP et al


Case Number

3:13-cv-03482

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Fraud

Judge

Susan Illston

Date Filed

July 26, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.