Fed. Circ. Rules 'Foreseeable' Equivalents Can Infringe

Law360, New York (February 19, 2014, 5:57 PM EST) -- The Federal Circuit on Wednesday clarified that the foreseeability of a possible equivalent invention does not bar a patent owner from proving infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, finding that car parts distributor Ring & Pinion Service Inc. had flouted a rival's patent for an automotive locking differential.

In a unanimous, precedential opinion, the panel flatly rejected R&P's position that because a portion of its locking differential was foreseeable at the time of ARB Corp. Ltd.'s patent application, ARB cannot secure an infringement finding under the...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Ring & Pinion Service Inc. v. ARB Corporation Ltd

Case Number



Appellate - Federal Circuit

Nature of Suit

830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)

Date Filed

March 3, 2013

Law Firms


Government Agencies


Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.