Fed. Circ. Rules 'Foreseeable' Equivalents Can Infringe

Law360, New York (February 19, 2014, 5:57 PM EST) -- The Federal Circuit on Wednesday clarified that the foreseeability of a possible equivalent invention does not bar a patent owner from proving infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, finding that car parts distributor Ring & Pinion Service Inc. had flouted a rival's patent for an automotive locking differential.

In a unanimous, precedential opinion, the panel flatly rejected R&P's position that because a portion of its locking differential was foreseeable at the time of ARB Corp. Ltd.'s patent application, ARB cannot secure an infringement finding under the...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Ring & Pinion Service Inc. v. ARB Corporation Ltd

Case Number



Appellate - Federal Circuit

Nature of Suit

830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)

Date Filed

March 3, 2013

Law Firms


Government Agencies


UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.