Pepsi Faces New Suit Over Hiding Caramel Color Content

Law360, New York (March 6, 2014, 6:07 PM EST) -- PepsiCo Inc. was hit with a new proposed class action Tuesday accusing it of violating California's Proposition 65 labeling requirements by failing to warn consumers that the caramel coloring in its Pepsi One drink contains a chemical that the state considers a carcinogen.

The beverage giant did not warn consumers that its Pepsi One soft drink contains the carcinogen 4-methylimidazole, known as 4-MEI, which has been on California's Proposition 65 list of carcinogens since 2011, according to a consumer suit by Kelly Ree lodged in California...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Kelly Ree v. PepsiCo, Inc.


Case Number

8:14-cv-00328

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Judge

David O. Carter

Date Filed

March 4, 2014

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.