High Court Gives 'Raging Bull' Copyright Suit 1 More Round

Law360, New York (May 19, 2014, 10:17 AM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday revived copyright claims brought against Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. by the daughter of "Raging Bull" author Frank Petrella, ruling the doctrine of laches couldn't be used to bar her claims even after a nearly two-decade delay.

By a vote of six to three, the justices reversed an August 2012 ruling by the Ninth Circuit that Paula Petrella was barred by laches from suing MGM for infringement over her father's 1963 script on which the iconic boxing flick was purportedly based.

The big question before the justices was whether laches — an equitable doctrine barring suits after unreasonable...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!