How An Antitrust Case Changed The Gay Marriage Debate

Law360, New York (May 21, 2014, 7:21 PM EDT) -- One might notice a curious case in the middle of the opinion handed down this week in Whitewood v. Wolf, No. 1:13-cv-1861, (M.D. Pa. May 20, 2014) striking down Pennsylvania's gay marriage ban. The caption, SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. Abbott Laboratories, 740 F.3d 471 (9th Cir. 2014), certainly sounds more like a typical business dispute between two giant pharmaceutical companies than a case involving fundamental rights. However, SmithKline may in fact be almost as important as United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013) in moving gay marriage forward.

In late 2007, SmithKline, now GlaxoSmithKline ("GSK"), lodged a complaint against...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!