NJ Justices Won't Review Damages For Dune-Blocked Views

Law360, New York (June 10, 2014, 5:57 PM EDT) -- The New Jersey Supreme Court on Thursday rejected the city of Ocean City, New Jersey’s petition for review of an appeals court decision that the city must compensate two couples whose beachfront views were impeded by sand dunes erected by the municipality.

Without comment, the state’s high court refused to hear Ocean City’s appeal of an Appellate Division ruling last October mandating that the city pay damages to Mr. and Mrs. Daniel T. Hughes and Mr. and Mrs. Nicholas J. Talotta, owners of condominiums in the same two-story facility whose view of the ocean was compromised when dunes constructed in 1989...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!