Resurgence Of 'Negligent Loan Servicing' Theory In Calif.

Law360, New York (September 17, 2014, 10:32 AM EDT) -- As attorneys who represent banks or loan servicers well know, the general rule in California has long been that a lender owes no duty of care to a borrower if the lender does not exceed its "conventional role as a lender of money."[1] That is, as long as the lender does not "actively participate" in the financed enterprise, and acts solely to protect its own security interest, it owes no duty beyond the loan's terms and cannot be held liable under a negligence theory.

In the last few years, the same "conventional role" analysis has often been applied to mortgage loan...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!