USPTO Ethics Rules May Change The Way You Email Clients

Law360, New York (December 4, 2014, 10:11 AM EST) -- Prosecution of a patent application — the act of negotiating with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or a foreign patent office to secure patent protection — generally can proceed without substantial client involvement. While client input may be valuable, its absence does not necessarily preclude a practitioner from taking action. Once appointed by a client to prosecute an application at the relevant patent office, the practitioner can prepare and file correspondence that attempts to distinguish the client's invention from the cited prior art. As a whole, this framework affords the practitioner a large degree of self-sufficiency.

The USPTO Rules of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!