A Look At The Latest Damages Model In Food Litigation

Law360, New York (March 19, 2015, 12:00 PM EDT) -- As food and beverage mislabeling class actions have continued to proliferate, plaintiffs have sometimes struggled to persuade courts that their proposed damages models are a reliable method of calculating classwide damages consistent with Comcast Corp. v. Behrend.[1] The new decision in In re ConAgra Foods Inc.,[2] however, certified 10 state classes based on an innovative — indeed unprecedented — dual methodological econometric damages model designed to overcome the pitfalls that have doomed class certification in other cases. As damages modeling continues to become more sophisticated, litigators should be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the methodologies employed by plaintiffs' experts attempting to prove that classwide damages can be reliably calculated....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!