Texas Ruling Won't End Anti-Concurrent Clause Suits

By Jeff Sistrunk (April 29, 2015, 2:25 PM EDT) -- The Texas Supreme Court's blessing of anti-concurrent causation clauses, exclusions that bar coverage for a loss caused by both a covered and excluded event, will not spell the end to causation battles across the state, attorneys say.

In an April 24 decision, the state high court affirmed Lexington Insurance Co.'s appellate win reversing a jury verdict under a policy that excluded coverage for flood damage even when the building was damaged concurrently by a covered cause of loss. The case marked the first time the Supreme Court had ruled on an anti-concurrent causation clause.

While the decision puts to bed the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!