Attys React To High Court's Induced Infringement Ruling

Law360, New York (May 26, 2015, 9:10 PM EDT) -- On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a good faith belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to induced infringement. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision in Commil USA LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc. is significant.

Matt Anderson, Munck Wilson Mandala

“This decision guards the rights of patent owners by ensuring that infringers are held to the proper standard when accused of contributory or induced infringement. Infringers are on notice that they can no longer escape liability by claiming that, even if they knew that actions they are inducing violate a patent, they didn’t believe the patent was...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!