NJ Finally Joins Trend: Consequential Damage Is Covered
Law360, New York (August 4, 2015, 9:12 AM EDT) -- Frederic Giordano
Bob Pawlowski Over the past decade, courts have wrestled with the issue of whether consequential damage caused by a subcontractor’s faulty workmanship constitutes “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” under commercial general liability policies. Most courts that have addressed the issue have held that unexpected and unintended damages caused by faulty workmanship may qualify as covered “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.” Some courts, however, have found that the faulty workmanship giving rise to such damages does not constitute an “occurrence” because such defects are the expected consequences of poor workmanship. Until lately, some argued that New Jersey was...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!