Ford Wins New Trial In Colo. Over Seat Design Injuries
By Joe Van Acker (September 10, 2015, 5:44 PM EDT) -- A Colorado jury received improper instructions before siding with a man who blamed an allegedly defective Ford Motor Co. seat design for brain and neck injuries he suffered in a car crash, a state appellate court ruled on Thursday, granting the automaker a new trial.
The court said that the instructions incorrectly included a consumer expectation test in a separate instruction, when that test falls under a separate, seven-factor risk-benefit test applied in another instruction.
"Part of plaintiff's theory at trial was based on the consumer expectation test — namely, that the plaintiff could recover if the jury found that an...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!