Law360, New York (September 24, 2015, 9:55 PM EDT) -- A California appellate court recently issued a decision that confirms that the pre-litigation safe harbor provision of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA") has teeth and should not be ignored. Recently, the court of appeals issued its opinion in Benson v. Southern California Auto Sales Inc., et al, Case No. G050484,15 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9763 (Aug. 27, 2015), holding that when an appropriate and timely correction offer is made in response to a CLRA notice of violation, a plaintiff cannot subsequently recover attorneys' fees or costs for continuing the litigation, despite the appropriate correction offer.
This case, which involved claims...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!