Don't Underestimate Calif. Correction Offers

Law360, New York (September 24, 2015, 9:55 PM EDT) -- A California appellate court recently issued a decision that confirms that the pre-litigation safe harbor provision of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA") has teeth and should not be ignored. Recently, the court of appeals issued its opinion in Benson v. Southern California Auto Sales Inc., et al, Case No. G050484,15 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9763 (Aug. 27, 2015), holding that when an appropriate and timely correction offer is made in response to a CLRA notice of violation, a plaintiff cannot subsequently recover attorneys' fees or costs for continuing the litigation, despite the appropriate correction offer....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.

A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!