Ex-DLA Piper Attorney Must Arbitrate Discrimination Claim

By Bonnie Eslinger (October 15, 2015, 10:25 PM EDT) -- A California judge sent to arbitration Thursday a wrongful termination suit from a former non-associate DLA Piper attorney claiming discrimination that included a significantly lower salary than associates despite her decade of service, saying an alleged "take-it-or-leave it" arbitration contract provision wasn't a bar to its enforcement.

On Thursday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Marc Marmaro issued a written tentative ruling that he made final at the hearing that granted the firm's bid to send the case to arbitration, saying that a so-called adhesion contract isn't automatically unconscionable, and thus unenforceable.

"Though relevant to the analysis, the adhesive nature of the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!