Excusable Neglect In Fla.: Who's In Charge Of Follow-Up?

Law360, New York (April 25, 2016, 3:01 PM EDT) -- Last month, the Florida Supreme Court reinstated a nearly $1.1 million judgment against a real estate investor who failed to timely answer a slip and fall complaint — even though the investor did not own the property on the date of the alleged injury. In doing so, the Florida Supreme Court reaffirmed two long-standing principles: 1) sufficiency of a complaint to state a cause of action must be determined solely by examination of the complaint and its attachments; and 2) failing to timely respond to a complaint can be an extremely costly mistake....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!