NJ Justices Say Atty Didn't Need Client's OK For Web Post

By Bill Wichert (July 19, 2016, 9:56 PM EDT) -- The New Jersey Supreme Court has dismissed ethics charges against an attorney over an article he published on his firm's website about an employment case, finding that he didn't need his client's prior consent to publicize publicly available material and he shouldn't be punished for not retaining copies of the website's pages....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!