Salman V. US: Will It Change The 'Personal Benefit' Test?

Law360, New York (August 3, 2016, 12:59 PM EDT) -- Nicolas Morgan

Thomas A. Zaccaro

Jenifer Q. Doan This fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in Salman v. United States, one of the most closely watched insider trading cases in decades. Salman will address a split between the Second and Ninth Circuits regarding key elements of tipper/tipper liability first articulated by the Supreme Court more than 30 years ago in Dirks v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). In particular, the court is expected to resolve the issue of what constitutes a "personal benefit" to a tipper sufficient to satisfy the Dirks standard for insider trading...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!