Plavix Ruling Cements Calif. As Center For Mass Torts

Law360, New York (August 30, 2016, 11:10 PM EDT) -- The California Supreme Court’s ruling that state courts have jurisdiction to hear out-of-state residents’ claims that they were injured by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.’s blood-thinner drug Plavix expands the scope of specific personal jurisdiction and cements the Golden State’s status as a battleground for mass torts, attorneys said on Tuesday.

In its split ruling, the state high court found Monday that a company’s business ties in the state were not enough to establish general jurisdiction — which enables a court to hear a case against a defendant regardless of the subject of the litigation — over nonresident plaintiffs’ claims. However, the majority of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!