6th Circ. Refuses To Send Tire Dispute To Arbitration In China

Law360, New York (December 1, 2016, 8:19 PM EST) -- A Chinese tire company that appealed an Ohio federal judge’s decision to keep its U.S. partner’s counterclaims alive in a dispute over their scuttled business relationship instead of sending them to arbitration in China had its case rejected by the Sixth Circuit on Thursday.

Although Shandong Linglong Tire Co. Ltd. and its affiliates argued that Horizon Tire Inc. is bound by a 2006 collaboration agreement to take up its disputes in the Chinese arbitral forum known as CIETAC, the unanimous appeals court disagreed. Not only did...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Linglong Americas, Inc., et al v. Horizon Tire, Inc., et al


Case Number

16-3520

Court

Appellate - 6th Circuit

Nature of Suit

4190 Contract: Other

Date Filed

May 19, 2016

Law Firms

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.