Calif. High Court Hears CEQA Row Over Coastal Project

Law360, San Francisco (January 4, 2017, 9:15 PM EST) -- A conservancy group asked the California Supreme Court Wednesday to reverse a lower court's finding that Newport Beach properly approved the building of housing and shops on undeveloped coastland known as the Banning Ranch, arguing the city violated the California Environmental Quality Act by failing to identify sensitive wildlife habitats on the site in its environmental impact report.

The Banning Ranch Conservancy's original Superior Court suit argued the City Council erred in approving the project, both because of the alleged CEQA violation and the city's failure to follow its own general plan's requirement that it work with the California Coastal Commission....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!