Lush Beats Suit Alleging Website Terms Shirk NJ Law

Law360, New York (March 22, 2017, 5:24 PM EDT) -- A New Jersey federal judge tossed a proposed class action alleging the terms of cosmetics company Lush’s website violate state law by trying to skirt duties owed to consumers, holding Wednesday that the act doesn't cover the shopper leading the suit because she didn’t read the conditions and hasn’t shown they harmed her.

Chief U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Simandle granted Lush Internet Inc.’s bid to toss litigation brought by Norris Hite, who alleged that the retailer violated the New Jersey Truth In Consumer Contract, Warranty...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

HITE v. LUSH COSMETICS, LLC.


Case Number

1:16-cv-01533

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Judge

Jerome B. Simandle

Date Filed

March 18, 2016

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.