Lush Beats Suit Alleging Website Terms Shirk NJ Law

By Shayna Posses (March 22, 2017, 5:24 PM EDT) -- A New Jersey federal judge tossed a proposed class action alleging the terms of cosmetics company Lush's website violate state law by trying to skirt duties owed to consumers, holding Wednesday that the act doesn't cover the shopper leading the suit because she didn't read the conditions and hasn't shown they harmed her.

Chief U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Simandle granted Lush Internet Inc.'s bid to toss litigation brought by Norris Hite, who alleged that the retailer violated the New Jersey Truth In Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, agreeing that the shopper hasn't alleged an injury sufficient to establish standing...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!