D Magazine Ruling Sheds Light On Texas Anti-SLAPP Statute

Law360, New York (April 11, 2017, 11:15 AM EDT) -- In D Magazine v. Rosenthal, the Supreme Court of Texas clarified two areas of defamation law: (1) lawyers (and lower courts) should think twice before citing Wikipedia in their analysis of whether a publication is reasonably capable of a defamatory meaning; and (2) parties that even partially win their "anti-SLAPP" motions to dismiss are entitled to recover their costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses. First Amendment lawyers, and lawyers bringing or defending defamation cases, ought to study the court's decision for guidance on how to hone their arguments for the future.

The Facts of the Case

A media defendant published an article...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Related Sections

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!