Law360, New York (April 17, 2017, 3:07 PM EDT) -- The number of “slack-fill” lawsuits claiming food companies trick consumers into thinking they are getting more product than they actually paid for has jumped more than six times since 2013, and that growth shows no signs of diminishing despite mixed results from judges’ decisions in these cases.
Lawyers who sue food companies say that their slack-fill class suits serve a greater good because they protect consumers and keep companies honest. But lawyers defending the companies say these are often frivolous nuisance suits that end up passing on legal costs to consumers in the supermarket check-out line. And at least one judge...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!