We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Leegin's 10-Year Checkup: Tips For Advising Clients On RPM

Law360, New York (June 29, 2017, 12:52 PM EDT) -- For nearly a century, resale price maintenance was a per se antitrust violation. Then, on June 28, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the legality of RPM should be determined on a case-by-case basis under the rule of reason. 

Now that a decade has passed since the landmark ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc., this weeklong Expert Analysis series examines its impact.

Janet McDavid

Meghan Rissmiller It has been 10 years since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin[1] overturned the nearly century-old precedent in Dr. Miles,[2] removing resale price maintenance (RPM) from the category of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS