Clarifying A Bankrupt Employer's WARN Act Obligations

By Robert Lewis (August 22, 2017, 12:37 PM EDT) -- The Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a significant decision on Aug. 4, 2017, Varela v. AE Liquidation Inc. (In re AE Liquidation Inc.), No. 16-2203 (3rd Cir. Aug. 4, 2017), that highlighted the interplay between the federal Bankruptcy Code and the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act. Charged with determining the correct standard for the "unforeseeable business circumstances" exception to a bankrupt employer's obligation under the WARN Act to provide 60 days' prior notice of a mass layoff, the Third Circuit adopted, for the first time, the standard used by the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and 10th Circuits: an employer's WARN obligations are triggered only when the mass layoff was probable, i.e., more likely than not, when WARN Act notice would otherwise have been required, rather than merely foreseeable....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!