Md. Court Says Judge's Errors Nix Man's Med Mal Trial Win
Law360, Los Angeles (September 5, 2017, 9:47 PM EDT) -- A Maryland appellate court on Friday overturned a jury's verdict in favor of a man accusing a neurosurgeon of failing to properly consider the risks of his spinal surgery, saying the trial judge erred by giving the jury certain special instructions and by tacitly imposing a one-hour verdict deadline.
In a published opinion, a three-judge Court of Special Appeals panel reversed a jury verdict awarding $329,00 to Mark Armacost in a suit accusing Dr. Reginald Davis of performing an anterior cervical discectomy despite the patient not being a good candidate for such a procedure, which purportedly caused a post-operative infection and...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!