Cisco's IP Defense In Antitrust Suit 'Insane,' Arista Says
By Dorothy Atkins (September 7, 2017, 6:15 PM EDT) -- Arista Networks Inc. urged a California federal judge Thursday to let it proceed with allegations that Cisco violated antitrust laws by interfering with sales of ethernet switches, calling "breathtakingly broad, unprecedented and insane" Cisco's defense that the case was barred by an ITC ruling that Arista had infringed Cisco patents.
Arista's Matthew Douglas Powers of Tensegrity Law Group LLP told U.S. District Judge Freeman that the technology described in Cisco Systems Inc.'s patents only applies to specific parts of Arista's switches and doesn't prohibit Arista from selling ethernet switch products altogether.
If Arista's technology infringes Cisco patents, Arista can pay Cisco...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!