L'Oréal Asks Rakoff To Lower Refund For Relaxer Burn Class

Law360, New York (September 13, 2017, 6:47 PM EDT) -- An attorney for L'Oréal argued Wednesday against the certification of a proposed class of women who allege the beauty products maker did not disclose its hair relaxer product may be dangerous, saying the proposed full refund damages model does not apply because some customers weren’t harmed by the product.

Justin D. Lewis of Gordon & Rees LLP, representing L'Oréal, argued that a class could not be certified without a viable damages model. The plaintiffs’ proposal that everyone who bought the hair relaxer gets their money back...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

In Re Amla Litigation


Case Number

1:16-cv-06593

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Personal Inj. Prod. Liability

Judge

Jed S. Rakoff

Date Filed

August 19, 2016

Law Firms

Judge Analytics

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.