Insurer Still On Hook For Post-Merger Coverage In BCB Row

By Rick Archer (September 20, 2017, 3:26 PM EDT) -- A New Jersey federal judge Monday found the dissolution of the original policyholder in a merger did not relieve Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. of the duty to defend the post-merger bank from a stockholder suit.

In an unpublished summary judgment, U.S. District Judge John Vasquez found that because BCB Bancorp and Pamrapo Bancorp merged under the terms of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act, the post-merger BCB inherited all of Pamrapo's contractual rights, including the right to a defense against the shareholder suit. 

"Through the statutory merger, the policy and the rights under the policy transferred to BCB such that BCB...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!