What A Solar Eclipse Has To Do With Market Efficiency

By Daniel Bettencourt and Steven Feinstein (November 17, 2017, 11:28 AM EST) -- On Nov. 6, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion in Strougo v. Barclays PLC, upholding the district court's certification of the investor class despite purported deficiencies in the plaintiffs' empirical test of market efficiency.[1] The appeals court ruled that the fifth Cammer factor, the direct or empirical factor, "is not always necessary to establish market efficiency." We believe the appeals court got it right. While the empirical factor, examined via an event study, is a powerful tool for demonstrating market efficiency or detecting inefficiency, it has its limitations. While the empirical factor is unique in that it can provide direct evidence of market efficiency or inefficiency, whereas other factors are indirect indicators, the empirical factor also has a unique limitation, as explained herein....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.

A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!