A Fair Rate Of Return Is Required When States Set Prices

Law360, New York (December 18, 2017, 10:15 AM EST) -- If the government sets prices for an industry but sets the rates so low that some businesses are unable to operate successfully, have the businesses been “taken” in violation of the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment? That’s the question that the U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to hear in the case of Mercury v. Jones, currently on petition to the Supreme Court. The court should grant Mercury’s petition in order to clarify the constitutionally required fair rate of return standard.

In general, businesses don’t have a constitutional right to earn a profit, but if the government steps in and...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!