Blind-Maker Hit With Fees For 'Lack Of Respect' For Patent

Law360, San Francisco (January 31, 2018, 7:12 PM EST) -- A California federal judge tripled damages that a jury awarded against a now-bankrupt blind-maker to $3 million and ordered it to pay $400,000 in attorneys’ fees, finding the company's litigation behavior "evinces a lack of respect for plaintiff’s patent rights and the litigation process.”

In a Jan. 29 ruling, U.S. District Judge Andrew J. Guilford found that the case is exceptional and warrants attorneys’ fees under the high court’s Octane Fitness ruling, particularly since the Chino, California-based Custom Blinds and Components Inc. failed to support its defense arguments at trial with evidence and expert testimony.

“Defendant maintained invalidity defenses through the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Patent

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

March 26, 2015

Patents

Judge Analytics