Safeguards Against State, Parallel Proceedings Post-Cyan

By Shayne Clinton and Britt Latham (May 8, 2018, 1:40 PM EDT) -- On March 20, 2018, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Cyan Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund answered two questions concerning investors' ability to pursue alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 in state and federal courts. First, the Supreme Court held that, while the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 "completely disallows" certain state law claims, SLUSA "did nothing to strip state courts of their longstanding jurisdiction to adjudicate class actions alleging only 1933 Act violations." By this ruling, the Supreme Court ended a long-running split among the courts by confirming concurrent state and federal court jurisdiction over class actions alleging only 1933 Act violations. Second, the Supreme Court went further and concluded that SLUSA does not authorize defendants to remove such actions from state to federal court....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!