Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:10-md-02143
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Gutnicki LLP
- Freed Kanner
- Saltz Mongeluzzi
- Bartko LLP
- Balch & Bingham
- Adamski Moroski
- Berman Tabacco
- KTBS Law
- Lieff Cabraser
- Girardi & Keese
- Law Office of John W. Davis
- Feuerstein Kulick
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Eimer Stahl
- Steven Williams Law
- Gardy & Notis
- DTO Law
- Gross & Belsky
- Sawyer & Labar
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Shapiro Haber
- Crowell & Moring
- Faegre Drinker
- Lockridge Grindal
- Pritzker Levine
- Pogust Goodhead
- Bryan Cave
- Lite DePalma
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Bandas Law Firm
- Smith Dollar
- BG Law (Woodland Hills, CA)
- Kaplan Fox
- Minami Tamaki
- Manning Kass
- Spector Roseman
- Cooper & Kirkham
- Greenspoon Marder
- Zelle LLP
- Stoel Rives
- Law Offices of Lingel H. Winters
- Kasowitz Benson
- Boni Zack
- Ehrlich & Craig
- Tucker Ellis
- Wilkes & Associates
- Hagens Berman
- Robins Kaplan
- Goodwin Procter
- DLA Piper
- Boies Schiller
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Katten Muchin
- Gustafson Gluek
- Baker Botts
- Beck Redden
- NastLaw
- Winston & Strawn
- Derek G. Howard Law Firm
- Jenkins Mulligan
- Davis Polk
- Pearson Warshaw
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Criden & Love
- Sidley Austin
- Alioto Law Firm
- Arias Sanguinetti
- Ropes & Gray
- Amy Harrington Law PC
- Paul Hastings
- O'Shea Partners
- DiCello Levitt
- Withersworldwide
- Stoll Berne
- PMRK Law
- Law Offices of Francis O. Scarpulla
- Hausfeld LLP
- Sheppard Mullin
- Kralowec Law
- SulmeyerKupetz
- Larson LLP
- Trump Alioto
- Gibson Dunn
- Bartlit Beck
- Morgan Lewis
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Hinshaw & Culbertson
- Cotchett Pitre
- Jones Day
- Orrick Herrington
- Cohen Milstein
- Vinson & Elkins
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Glancy Prongay
- Alston & Bird
- Jackson Lewis PC
- Blank Rome
- A&O Shearman
- Damrell Nelson
- Novak Druce
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Saveri & Saveri
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
Companies
- BenQ Corp.
- TD SYNNEX Corp.
- Ingram Micro Inc.
- Hitachi Ltd.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Quanta Storage
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Panasonic Corp.
- Apple Inc.
- Dell Technologies Inc.
- Acer Inc.
- Sony Group Corp.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- NEC Corp.
- Sharp Corp.
- Newegg Inc.
- Signify N.V.
- Class Action Capital
- Toshiba Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 18, 2015
Attys Seek $11.3M In Fees For Optical Disk Drive MDL Deals
Attorneys representing direct purchasers in sprawling multidistrict litigation alleging a conspiracy to fix prices on optical disk drives asked a California federal judge Tuesday to approve their attorneys' fees, equal to about a third of the nearly $38 million in settlements they have secured thus far.
-
October 17, 2014
Judge Says Toshiba-Samsung's Secrecy In MDL 'Preposterous'
A California federal judge on Friday ordered Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. Korea to hand over recordings of conversations between a government cooperator and several co-defendants in multidistrict litigation over price-fixing on optical disk drives, calling the nonparty Korean company's efforts to withhold the tapes "preposterous."
-
October 06, 2014
Disk Drive Buyers Denied Class Cert. In Price-Fixing MDL
A California federal judge on Friday refused to certify two classes of purchasers accusing Toshiba Corp. and other electronics producers of conspiring to fix the prices of optical disk drives, finding that neither group had provided a workable methodology for establishing classwide injury and damages.
-
August 08, 2014
LG, Hitachi Seek To Nix Contract Claims In Disk Drive MDL
LG Electronics Inc., Hitachi-LG Data Storage Inc. and several other electronics companies urged a California federal judge on Thursday to nix contract claims brought by Hewlett-Packard Co. in multidistrict litigation over optical disk drive price-fixing, claiming HP has failed to allege the existence of any valid contracts.
-
July 11, 2014
Pioneer Escapes Acer's Optical Disk Drive Price-Fixing Suit
A California federal judge on Thursday signed off on Pioneer Corp.'s bid to evade a lawsuit brought by Acer Inc. over an alleged conspiracy to fix the price of optical disk drives, but said similar claims against Toshiba Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and others in multidistrict litigation must remain.
-
April 24, 2014
NEC's $6M Deal OK'd In Disk Drive Price-Fixing MDL
A California federal judge on Thursday granted preliminary approval to a $6 million deal between NEC Corp. and customers who directly purchased the company's optical disk drives, allowing NEC to exit sprawling multidistrict litigation alleging a conspiracy to fix prices on CD, DVD and Blu-Ray computer disk drives.
-
April 09, 2014
Fla.'s Antitrust Case On Fewer Legs In Disk Drive MDL
A California federal court on Tuesday partly nixed claims brought by the state of Florida in multidistrict litigation accusing optical disk drive makers of price-fixing, ruling that its state antitrust claims were unsupported by evidence.
-
March 20, 2014
Judge Likely to Pare Fla. Claims In Disk Drive Antitrust MDL
A California federal judge overseeing multidistrict litigation accusing optical disk drive makers of price-fixing said Thursday that he's inclined to toss the state of Florida's claim that the manufacturers violated its state antitrust law, saying Florida hasn't shown enough evidence that the alleged scheme took place within its borders.
-
March 04, 2014
Disk Drive Cos. Say Fla.'s Antitrust Claims Fatally Flawed
Several optical disk drive manufacturers including Toshiba Corp. and Panasonic Corp. reiterated their call Monday for a California federal judge to toss a portion of a price-fixing suit brought by Florida, claiming the state has conjured misleading arguments in an effort to keep the suit alive.
-
February 24, 2014
Fla. Contracts Allow For Price-Fixing Claims, Court Hears
The state of Florida on Friday defended its right to bring an antitrust suit in California federal court against optical disk drive manufacturers on behalf of vendors who signed state contracts, alleging that the defendants have employed a "nonsensical" reading of the pacts to elude price-fixing claims.