Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
IN RE: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION - MDL 1869
Case Number:
1:07-mc-00489
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Freed Kanner
- Saltz Mongeluzzi
- Gustafson Gluek
- Peterson & Associates PC
- Goodwin Procter
- Skadden Arps
- Werner Ahari
- Kaplan Fox
- Eimer Stahl
- Dentons
- Jones Day
- Troutman
- Gross & Belsky
- Slover & Loftus
- Arnold & Porter
- Zelle LLP
- Cera LLP
- Massey & Gail
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Cohen Milstein
- Wollmuth Maher
- Seeger Weiss
- Horn Aylward
- Robins Kaplan
- Hausfeld LLP
- Nace Law Group
- Spector Roseman
- The Terrell Law Group
- Munger Tolles
- Thompson Hine
- Crowell & Moring
- Covington & Burling
- Boni Zack
- Yetter Coleman
- Haskell Slaughter
- Clyde & Co
- Lovell Stewart
- Berger Montague
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Vinson & Elkins
- Carella Byrne
- Much Shelist
- Quinn Emanuel
- King & Spalding
- Ballard Spahr
- Freed & Weiss
- Keller Rohrback
- Weil Gotshal
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Steptoe LLP
- Audet & Partners
- Walters Renwick
- Heins Mills
- Mehri & Skalet
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Dechert LLP
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Whatley Kallas
- Williams Schifino
- Sperling Kenny
- Susman Godfrey
- Ashcraft & Gerel
- Orrick Herrington
- Fine Kaplan
- Haug Partners
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
Companies
- Olin Corp.
- Cedar Creek Wholesale Inc.
- M.C. Dixon Lumber Co. Inc.
- Rayonier Inc.
- Alabama Power
- Georgia Power Co.
- Kellogg Co.
- Ameren Corp.
- Oxbow Corp.
- CSX Corp.
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co.
- Ferraro Foods Inc.
- AK Steel Holding Corp.
- The Southern Co. Inc.
- Entergy Corp.
- Association of American Railroads
- Dyno Nobel Ltd.
- CF Industries Holdings Inc.
- Dow Inc.
- Kansas City Southern
- BNSF Railway Co.
- Norfolk Southern Corp.
- Union Pacific Corp.
- Alabama Power Co.
- Dairyland Power Cooperative
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 08, 2021
Rail Cos. Call Discovery Order 'Prime Candidate' For Appeal
The country's four rail giants have urged a D.C. federal judge to let them immediately appeal his refusal to exclude the bulk of the evidence in long-running multidistrict litigation alleging a fuel surcharge price-fixing scheme, arguing the decision affects the health of "the entire railroad industry."
-
February 19, 2021
Discovery Order Means No 'De Facto' Immunity For Rail Cos.
A D.C. federal judge refused Friday to exclude evidence comprising the backbone of long-running private multidistrict litigation accusing the country's four rail giants of scheming to fix fuel surcharge prices, an exclusion the U.S. Department of Justice had argued would amount to inoculation from the allegations.
-
August 26, 2020
No 'De Facto' Antitrust Immunity For Rail Giants, DOJ Says
The U.S. Department of Justice urged a D.C. federal judge in oral arguments Wednesday not to use an untested 40-year-old law establishing evidentiary limitations in certain circumstances to essentially inoculate the country's four rail giants from long-running private litigation alleging a scheme to fix fuel surcharge prices.
-
August 21, 2020
A 40-Year-Old Law, 4 Rail Giants & 1 Big Antitrust Question
The U.S. Department of Justice will be charting a middle path Aug. 26 in D.C. federal court between shippers and rail giants on opposite sides of the tracks over whether an untested 40-year-old law offers any protection from long-running allegations of a scheme to fix fuel surcharge prices.
-
August 14, 2020
DOJ Summoned Again For Opinion On Rail Price-Fix Case
The U.S. Department of Justice has been called to D.C. federal court to weigh in on a specific slice of the U.S. Code that has bearing on long-running multidistrict litigation between the nation's biggest railway carriers and the shippers who say they schemed to fix fuel surcharge prices.
-
August 04, 2020
Railway Cos. Call DOJ View On Price-Fix Evidence 'Incoherent'
The U.S. Department of Justice's argument for why the nation's four biggest railway carriers can't block virtually all the evidence brought against them in long-running private antitrust litigation is "incoherent," the companies told a D.C. federal judge Monday.
-
July 29, 2020
DOJ Says Rail Giants Can't Limit Price-Fixing Evidence
The country's four largest railroad carriers cannot exclude everything but "direct" evidence of a fuel surcharge price-fixing conspiracy from private multidistrict litigation, the U.S. Department of Justice told a D.C. federal judge Tuesday.
-
February 26, 2020
DOJ, FTC Asked To Weigh In On Rail Price-Fixing Case
A D.C. federal judge said Tuesday he'll be inviting the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission to chime in on long-running multidistrict litigation by shippers accusing the country's four largest railroad carriers of conspiring to fix fuel surcharge prices.
-
October 11, 2017
Rail Shippers Denied Cert. In Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Row
A group of rail shippers lost their bid for class certification in long-running multidistrict litigation accusing railroad giants of conspiring to fix fuel surcharges after a D.C. federal judge ruled Tuesday that there were still some individualized issues and the plaintiffs' model for calculating damages was flawed.
-
September 27, 2016
Rail Cos. Blast 'Rigged' Damages Model In Fuel Charge Suit
Railroads accused of conspiring to fix fuel surcharges claimed in D.C. federal court Tuesday that an expert hired by a putative class of shippers rigged his economic analysis to come up with billions of dollars in damages, the latest volley in a class recertification battle.