Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:02-md-01486
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Arguedas Cassman
- Arnold & Porter
- Ballard Spahr
- Bandas Law Firm
- Barrett Johnston
- Bass Berry
- Berman Tabacco
- Bilzin Sumberg
- Black Slaughter
- Blood Hurst
- BoiesBattin
- Boies Schiller
- Bonsignore Trial Lawyers
- Bottini & Bottini
- Bramson Plutzik
- Brown Raysman
- Chan Punzalan
- Cooper & Kirkham
- Costell & Adelson
- Cozen O'Connor
- Criden & Love
- Crowell & Moring
- Damrell Nelson
- Dechert LLP
- DLA Piper
- Ellis George
- Faegre Drinker
- Farmer Brownstein
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Ferguson Chambers
- Finkelstein Thompson
- Finnegan
- Freed Kanner
- Freedman Normand
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Gibson Dunn
- Gilman Law LLP
- Glancy Prongay
- Glaser Weil
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Gordon Law Offices
- Greenberg Traurig
- Green & Noblin PC
- Gross & Belsky
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hagens Berman
- Hausfeld LLP
- Heins Mills
- Hellmuth & Johnson
- Janssen Malloy
- Jenner & Block
- Jones Day
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kaplan Fox
- Karon LLC
- Kasowitz Benson
- Keller Postman
- Kirby McInerney
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Kirton McConkie
- Kralowec Law
- Krause Kalfayan
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Offices of Francis O. Scarpulla
- Lite DePalma
- Liuzzi Murphy
- Lovell Stewart
- McKay Burton
- Messing Adam
- Miller Shah LLP
- MoginRubin
- Morrison Foerster
- NastLaw
- Newmeyer & Dillion
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Pearson Warshaw
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Richards Brandt
- Robbins Geller
- Robins Kaplan
- Saveri & Saveri
- Schack Law Group
- Schubert Jonckheer
- Seeger Weiss
- Shaheen & Gordon
- Shartsis Friese
- Sheehey Furlong
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sherrard Roe
- Simpson Thacher
- Smith Dollar
- Sohn Legal Group
- Spector Roseman
- Spencer Fane
- Spiegel Liao
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Stonebarger Law
- Trump Alioto
- Weil Gotshal
- White & Case
- Wilentz Goldman
- Wilson Sonsini
- Winston & Strawn
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Womble Bond
- Wyatt & Blake
- Zelle LLP
- Zwerling Schachter
Companies
- All American Semiconductor Inc.
- Celestica Inc.
- Edge Electronics Inc.
- Hitachi Ltd.
- Honeywell International Inc.
- Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.
- Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd.
- Infineon Technologies AG
- International Business Machines Corp.
- Korea Development Bank
- Korea Exchange
- Micron Technology Inc.
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
- NEC Corp.
- Oracle Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Technicolor
- Toshiba Corp.
- Unisys Corp.
- Woori Bank
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 25, 2014
$310M DRAM Price-Fixing Deal Sails Past Objectors
A California federal judge granted final approval Wednesday to a $310 million settlement that includes $78 million for attorneys in indirect purchasers' multidistrict litigation accusing makers of computer memory chips of price-fixing, overruling objectors who said the deal wasn't fair because it includes states that don't allow indirect purchaser claims.
-
June 12, 2014
DRAM Indirect Purchasers Press Judge On $78M Fee Bid
Counsel for indirect purchasers and numerous state attorneys nudged a California federal judge on Tuesday to approve a nearly $78 million fee request in antitrust litigation over the dynamic random-access memory market, arguing they only received four objections to fees for securing a $310 million settlement.
-
May 05, 2014
Objectors Question $310M Samsung, Toshiba Settlement
The $310 million settlement meant to end a series of antitrust class actions against Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Toshiba Corp. and others over the dynamic random-access memory market garnered two objections Monday, calling the settlement unfair to California class members.
-
March 12, 2014
Straus & Boies, Others Want $78M In DRAM Antitrust Case
Counsel for indirect purchasers and numerous state attorneys general asked a California federal judge on Tuesday to approve a nearly $77.7 million fee request in antitrust litigation over the dynamic random-access memory market, arguing their decadelong effort to secure a $310 million settlement merited the award.
-
December 12, 2013
Samsung, Other Cos. Fork Over $310M In DRAM Antitrust Suit
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Toshiba Corp. and other technology firms on Wednesday agreed to pay $310 million to settle a series of class actions based in California federal court brought by individual purchasers and state attorneys general alleging a host of anti-competitive conduct in the dynamic random-access memory market.