Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

October 23, 2002

In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation

Track this case

Case Number:

4:02-md-01486

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action, Multi-district Litigation

Judge:

Phyllis J. Hamilton

Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. June 25, 2014

    $310M DRAM Price-Fixing Deal Sails Past Objectors

    A California federal judge granted final approval Wednesday to a $310 million settlement that includes $78 million for attorneys in indirect purchasers' multidistrict litigation accusing makers of computer memory chips of price-fixing, overruling objectors who said the deal wasn't fair because it includes states that don't allow indirect purchaser claims.

4 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login