In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

4:11-cv-06714

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. September 06, 2013

    IPhone Users Take Another Crack At Monopoly Suit

    A group of iPhone users on Thursday renewed class action claims against Apple Inc. in a bid to avoid having its suit dismissed again, adding details to its allegations that the company illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its App Store.

  2. August 15, 2013

    Apple Dodges IPhone App Store Monopoly Suit

    A California federal judge on Thursday threw out iPhone users' class action claims that Apple Inc. illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its app store and demanded a cut of third-party sales, saying the plaintiffs failed to establish standing to sue.

  3. March 05, 2013

    Apple's App Store Not An Illegal Monopoly, Judge Hears

    Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge Tuesday to toss iPhone customers' class claims that the tech giant illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its app store and demanded a cut of third-party sales, arguing that the plaintiffs have failed to show Apple violated antitrust laws.

  4. November 05, 2012

    Apple Says IPhone Service Monopoly Suit Ignores Court Order

    Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge on Friday to dismiss a newly refiled class action claiming it monopolized the aftermarket for iPhone services, arguing that plaintiffs disregarded a court order to add AT&T Mobility LLC as a defendant.