Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds et al v. National RailRoad Passenger Corporation et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-04717
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Anderson Kill
- Cahill Gordon
- Clausen Miller
- Cozen O'Connor
- Crowell & Moring
- Dilworth Paxson
- Hardin Kundla
- Hinshaw & Culbertson
- Jackson & Campbell
- Jaspan Schlesinger
- Karbal Cohen
- Lewis Baach
- Litchfield Cavo
- Locke Lord
- Lowenstein Sandler
- Milber Makris
- Montgomery McCracken
- Orrick Herrington
- Rivkin Radler
- Shipman & Goodwin
- Traub Lieberman
- Zelle LLP
Companies
- Aegon NV
- American Home Assurance Co.
- Assicurazioni Generali
- AXA XL Ltd.
- Granite State Insurance Co.
- Lexington Insurance Co.
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
- Stantec Inc.
- The Cigna Group
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 28, 2017
Jury Finds Insurers Owe Amtrak $14.3M For Pollution Cleanup
Amtrak is entitled to coverage in its dispute with a group of London market insurers over environmental cleanup coverage, a New York federal jury found on Wednesday, awarding the train company $14.3 million, Amtrak announced.
-
September 22, 2017
Amtrak Pollution Could Be 'Accidental,' Judge Says
A New York federal judge hearing a dispute between Amtrak and a group of London market insurers over environmental cleanup coverage Thursday agreed with the rail company that the pollution could have been "accidental," but he rejected Amtrak's definition of "sudden."
-
August 17, 2017
Ground Rules Set For Amtrak Cleanup Coverage Battle In NY
A New York federal judge on Thursday laid ground rules for how a jury should determine whether Amtrak is entitled to coverage from scores of insurance companies for environmental cleanup costs and held that, if multiple policies are triggered, the insurers must spread coverage proportionally on a pro rata basis.
-
May 08, 2017
Amtrak Settles With Insurer In Cleanup Coverage Dispute
Evanston Insurance Co. on Monday became the latest insurer to reach a settlement with Amtrak in a suit over coverage for environmental cleanup costs and asbestos exposure liability.
-
November 18, 2016
Amtrak Can't Withhold Docs In Cleanup Coverage Row
A New York federal magistrate judge on Thursday told Amtrak to reproduce two documents it had clawed back in a dispute involving dozens of London insurers attempting to skirt coverage of environmental cleanup and asbestos exposure liability.
-
September 21, 2016
Amtrak, Insurers Settle In Cleanup Coverage Fight
Amtrak told a New York federal judge on Tuesday that it has reached a settlement with a pair of the railroad service's insurers in a suit over coverage for environmental cleanup costs and asbestos exposure liability. Correction: A previous version of this story misstated the settling parties. The error has been corrected.
-
May 16, 2016
Insurers Must Produce Some Docs In Amtrak Coverage Fight
A New York federal court on Monday ordered AIG companies to produce for Amtrak dozens of documents from 2006 to 2012 in a dispute involving dozens of London insurers attempting to skirt coverage of environmental cleanup and asbestos exposure liability, saying AIG failed to show the documents were privileged.
-
March 18, 2016
Insurers' Move To Keep Documents Is Off Track, Amtrak Says
Amtrak urged a New York federal court Thursday to stand by its decision to force dozens of London insurers attempting to skirt coverage of environmental cleanup and asbestos exposure liability to produce attorney-client communication documents, saying the insurers' dissatisfaction isn't grounds for reconsideration.
-
February 22, 2016
Amtrak Gets Insurer Docs In Environmental Cleanup Suit
A New York federal judge on Friday granted Amtrak's bid to force dozens of London insurers to produce documents in their suit seeking to dodge covering the government-backed railroad service for environmental cleanup and asbestos exposure liability, saying the documents were not kept confidential.
-
March 13, 2015
Suit Over Amtrak Enviro, Asbestos Claims To Stay In NY
A New York federal judge on Friday denied Amtrak's bid to to transfer to the District of Columbia a lawsuit filed by dozens of the government-backed railroad service's insurers disclaiming coverage for environmental cleanup obligations and for liability for exposing individuals to asbestos and other harmful substances.