Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
United States v. Navistar Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-06143
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Babst Calland
- Baker & Hostetler
- DLA Piper
- Haynes & Boone
- Hogan Lovells
- Kelley Drye
- K&L Gates
- Latham & Watkins
- Sidley Austin
- Van Ness Feldman
Companies
- AB Volvo
- Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
- Caterpillar Inc.
- Cummins Inc.
- Deere & Co.
- Navistar International Corp.
- PACCAR Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 17, 2016
EPA Says Navistar Liability For Uncertified Engines Is Clear
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has urged an Illinois federal court to find Navistar Inc. liable for manufacturing and selling thousands of heavy-duty diesel engines that were not certified in compliance with the Clean Air Act, arguing there is no dispute that the noncompliant engines were put into commerce.
-
July 15, 2015
EPA Says Navistar Engines Violate Emissions Laws
The government launched a suit Tuesday in Illinois federal court accusing Navistar Inc. of violating the Clean Air Act by selling heavy-duty diesel engines without the Environmental Protection Agency's approval that they meet emissions standards.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →