We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

June 27, 2016

United States of America v Rolls-Royce North America, Inc., et al

Track this case

Case Number:



Texas Western

Nature of Suit:

Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. sect; 3729(a))


Sam Sparks



Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


  1. March 13, 2018

    Rolls-Royce Wins Bids To Exit FCA Suit, DQ Atty

    A Texas federal judge agreed Monday with a magistrate judge’s conclusions that Rolls-Royce should escape a False Claims Act suit alleging it billed the U.S. Air Force for uncertified parts and that the whistleblower’s attorney should be disqualified, saying the relator unsuccessfully pursued these claims previously and his attorney once worked for the company.

3 other articles on this case. View all »


To view the parties, register now.