Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Case Number:
1:17-cv-00036
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Cooley LLP
- Ellis George
- Gibson Dunn
- McKool Smith
- Perkins Coie
- Quinn Emanuel
- Sullivan & Cromwell
Companies
- Bank of America Corp.
- BMO Harris Bank NA
- Charles Schwab Bank
- Citigroup Inc.
- City National Bank
- Cullen Frost Bankers Inc.
- Deutsche Bank AG
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
- Morgan Stanley
- New York Community Bancorp Inc.
- Northern Trust Corp.
- Popular Inc.
- The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
- The Charles Schwab Corp.
- The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
- United Services Automobile Association
- Webster Financial Corp.
- Wells Fargo & Co.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 08, 2024
DC Judge Strikes 2 BofA Experts In $1.1B FDIC Premiums Suit
Bank of America can't use a certified public accountant and an economics scholar it had enlisted to fend off a Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. suit accusing the financial institution of failing to pay $1.1 billion in premiums, a federal magistrate judge has determined, finding both experts offered inadmissible opinions.
-
April 20, 2023
BofA May Face Trial In FDIC's $1.1B Unpaid Premium Suit
A D.C. federal magistrate has preliminarily ruled Bank of America NA should be held liable for allegedly underpaying its deposit insurance premiums a decade ago, recommending that the bank face trial to determine whether it owes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. more than $500 million or $1.1 billion.
-
May 06, 2021
FDIC Says BofA Disgorgement Not Blocked By FTC Ruling
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. told a D.C. federal judge on Thursday that a recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is no obstacle to the agency pursuing disgorgement from Bank of America in a lawsuit alleging the bank owes more than $1.1 billion in unpaid deposit insurance assessments.
-
May 24, 2019
FDIC Switched Rule In $1.1B Deposit Shortfall Suit, BofA Says
Bank of America on Friday argued that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. might be trying to hide documents that show the regulator retroactively applied a rule change to show the bank underpaid deposit protection fees to the tune of $1.1 billion.
-
April 04, 2018
BofA Must Face $1.1B Deposit Protection Shortfall Suit
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. scored a victory in its $1.1 billion suit against Bank of America Corp. over years of alleged underpayments for deposit protection when a Washington, D.C., federal court shut down the bank's bid to toss the suit.
-
January 09, 2017
FDIC Sues BofA Over $1B Insurance Fund Shortfall
The U.S. regulator charged with insuring bank deposits on Monday sued Bank of America Corp. alleging that years of improper accounting resulted in the bank avoiding more than $1 billion in payments to the federal deposit insurance fund.