Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case Number:
0:18-cv-01776
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Axinn Veltrop
- Barrett Law Group
- Bowman & Brooke
- BrownWinick
- Covington & Burling
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost
- Dykema
- Faegre Drinker
- Forsgren Fisher
- Gibson Dunn
- Gordon Rees
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Greene Espel
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hagens Berman
- Hart McLaughlin
- Hogan Lovells
- Husch Blackwell
- Jones Day
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kaplan Fox
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Larkin Hoffman
- Larson King
- Lathrop GPM
- Law Office of Thomas J. Nolan
- Lockridge Grindal
- Manning Law Firm
- Meagher & Geer
- Pearson Warshaw
- Quinn Emanuel
- Robins Kaplan
- Spector Roseman
- Sperling Kenny
- Stinson LLP
- Taft Stettinius
- Tostrud Law Group
- Winthrop & Weinstine
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
- Agri Stats Inc.
- Clemens Food Group LLC
- Hormel Foods Corp.
- Seaboard Corp.
- Shamrock Foods Co.
- Smithfield Foods Inc.
- Triumph Foods LLC
- Tyson Foods Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 24, 2020
Pork Buyers Bite Into Dismissal Bid On Renewed Claims
Meat buyers defended rejiggered class action price-fixing claims they proposed in Minnesota federal court following attacks from Smithfield, Tyson and other major pork producers, with the buyers arguing they have more than adequately connected the producers' cutbacks in output to higher pork prices.
-
August 08, 2019
Pork Buyers See Tyson Price-Fixing Claims Axed, For Now
Smithfield, Tyson and other major pork producers scored a large win Thursday when a Minnesota federal judge dismissed without prejudice a consolidated class action brought by three groups of meat purchasers that accused the companies of conspiring to increase the price of pork products.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next →