Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
September 29, 2016
In re Wells Fargo & Company Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Case Number:
4:16-cv-05541
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Arguedas Cassman
- Arnold & Porter
- Berger Montague
- Berman Tabacco
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Bottini & Bottini
- Bramson Plutzik
- Ciardi Ciardi
- Clarence Dyer & Cohen
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Ehrlich & Craig
- Farmer Brownstein
- Glancy Prongay
- Goodwin Procter
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute
- Harwood Feffer
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Lieff Cabraser
- Ridley McGreevy
- Robbins LLP
- Saxena White
- Shearman & Sterling
- Shuman Glenn
- Skaggs Faucette
- Springer Ayeni
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Williams & Connolly
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 05, 2021
No Sanctions For Objector In Wells Fargo Fake Account Deal
A California federal judge has declined to sanction an objector to a Wells Fargo settlement over fake accounts after investors accused the objector and his attorneys of extorting $1.75 million from the bank, saying the court won't order disgorgement of a settlement reached in a state court lawsuit.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login