Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
February 17, 2021
In re Accellion, Inc. Data Breach Litigation
Case Number:
5:21-cv-01155
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Artiga-Purcell Law Office
- Baker & Hostetler
- Barnow and Associates
- Blood Hurst
- Casey Gerry
- Cozen O'Connor
- Crowell & Moring
- Emery Reddy
- Gibbs Mura
- Girard Sharp
- Glancy Prongay
- Kaplan Fox
- Latham & Watkins
- Lockridge Grindal
- Lynch Carpenter
- Morgan & Morgan PA
- Orrick Herrington
- Roberts Law Firm US
- Scott&Scott
- Sidley Austin
- Skadden Arps
- Susman Godfrey
- The Norton Law Firm
- Tusan Law
- Tycko & Zavareei
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
October 01, 2025
Accellion Breach Plaintiffs Get Cert. For Narrow Subclasses
A California federal judge has agreed to allow plaintiffs to proceed with five subclasses in their dispute with Accellion over allegations the company failed to protect against cyberattacks on its file-sharing software, while finding that a lack of "cohesion" doomed their chances to certify a broader negligence class of roughly 5 million breach victims.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login